Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science
  • New Submission
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • فارسی

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery

  • Home
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Author Guideline
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Archives
    • Current
    • Accepted Manuscript
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Publication Ethics and Research Misconduct
    • Ethical Considerations for Human Subjects
  • Declaration of AI Use
  • New Submission
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 17 No. 56 (2007): Fall 2007
  4. Research Article-Nursing

Vol. 17 No. 56 (2007)

October 2007

Sampling in quantitative research

  • M Khatiban
  • J Abed Saeed
  • I Ashtari

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, Vol. 17 No. 56 (2007), 4 October 2007 , Page 61-69
https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v17i56.694

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: Sampling is an important phase in research, which directly influences on applicability and generalizability of findings. Therefore, it is critical in research process.

 

Purpose: The purpose of this review was to assess sampling methods in published articles at the first 3 issues of  the Journal of "Nursing Research" in 2004.

 

Materials and Methods: A checklist was first made by reviewing literature and all articles in the issues were chosen. A critical appraisal of literature review, methods, results and discussion of the articles was performed by the checklist. SPSS package was used for data analysis.

 

Results: Findings showed that samples in most studies were healthy people. Published articles explained about the target population, accessible population, the number of subjects and their features. However, a systematic bias was observed in all studied studies.

 

Conclusion: Most authors did not describe the sampling method of their studies completely. This may make the critical review of sampling design, duplication of study and future meta-analysis hard. In addition, sample representativeness, sampling errors and systematic bias cannot be thoroughly evaluated. In most articles, authors referred to limitations resulted from failure in sampling design, which may restrict generalization.

  

Keywords: Research Critique, Sampling.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Khatiban, M., Abed Saeed, J., & Ashtari, I. (2007). Sampling in quantitative research. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, 17(56), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v17i56.694
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 1418 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 1276 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Language

  • English
  • فارسی
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Print ISSN: 2383-3750
Electronic ISSN: 2538-399X

Powered by OJSPlus