Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science
  • New Submission
  • ثبت‌نام
  • ورود
  • فارسی
    • English

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery

  • Home
  • اطلاعیه‌ها
  • درباره
    • درباره‌ی مجله
    • Editorial Board
    • Author Guideline
    • بیانه حریم خصوصی
    • اطلاعات تماس
  • Issues
    • بایگانی‌ها
    • شماره جاری
    • Accepted Manuscript
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Publication Ethics and Research Misconduct
    • Ethical Considerations for Human Subjects
  • Declaration of AI Use
  • New Submission
جستجوی پیشرفته
  1. صفحه اصلی
  2. بایگانی‌ها
  3. دوره 18 شماره 63 (2009): Summer 2009
  4. Research Article-Nursing

دوره 18 شماره 63 (2009)

ژوئیهٔ 2009

Comparing cuff pressure changes in two types of endotracheal tube

  • M Yoldashkhan
  • F Safary

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, دوره 18 شماره 63 (2009), 26 ژوئیهٔ 2009 , صفحه 5-11
https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v18i63.1162 چاپ شده: 2009-07-26

  • مقاله
  • دانلود
  • ارجاع
  • آمار
  • اشتراک

چکیده

Background

Since medical devices from different manufacturers with various qualities may affect on outcome of interventions, studies regarding the correctness of them in terms of material and function have always been a major topic.

Purpose

This clinical trial was conducted to compare cuff pressure changes in two endotracheal tubes (ETT) in contact with nitrous oxide gas, manufactured in Iran and Malaysia.

Methods

50 patients having elective surgery in Loghman Hakim Hospital and categorized in classes 1 and 2 according to American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA І, П) were randomly divided into 2 groups (27 and 23 subjects). In the first group with 27 subjects, Iranian tubes and in the other, Malasian ones were used. ETT cuffs were filled with air via minimal leak method and cuff pressures were measured by a cuff pressure indicator (VBM). It was connected to a pilot cuff until the end of anesthesia. Meanwhile, nitrous oxide 50% was prescribed for patients during anesthesia and the pressure was recorded every 20 minutes until 120 minutes of anesthesia.

Results

Mean and standard deviation of pressures in the cuffs of Iranian tubes before nitrous oxide administration were 96.43 and 8.23 respectively. The corresponding figures for pressures in Malaysian tubes were 17.32 and 97.4, which showed a significant difference (t=2.585, P=0.015). The standard deviation of Iranian tubes was significantly greater than Malysian ones (F=38.633, P<0.001).

Conclusion

It can be concluded that mean base pressures in the 2 types of tubes have no difference. This denotes that, at the beginning, there is no significant difference and the cuffs of Iranian tubes in spite of being filled with air like Malaysian ones show higher pressure difference. Mean base pressures of cuffs at different times indicate significant difference two by two.

 

Keywords: Cuff pressure of endotracheal tube, Nitrous oxide gas.

  • PDF (English)

ارجاع به مقاله

Yoldashkhan, M., & Safary, F. (2009). Comparing cuff pressure changes in two types of endotracheal tube. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, 18(63), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v18i63.1162
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acm-sig-proceedings##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acs-nano##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.apa##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.associacao-brasileira-de-normas-tecnicas##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.chicago-author-date##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.harvard-cite-them-right##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.ieee##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.modern-language-association##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.turabian-fullnote-bibliography##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.vancouver##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.ris##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.bibtex##
  • چکیده مشاهده شده: 532 بار
  • PDF (English) دانلود شده: 430 بار

آمار دانلود

  • لینکدین
  • تویتر
  • فیسبوک
  • گوگل پلاس
  • تلگرام

اطلاعات

  • برای خوانندگان
  • برای نویسندگان
  • برای کتابداران

زبان

  • English
  • فارسی
  • صفحه اصلی
  • بایگانی
  • ارسال مقاله
  • درباره‌ی مجله
  • تیم سردبیری
  • اطلاعات تماس

Print ISSN: 2383-3750
Electronic ISSN: 2538-399X

قدرت یافته از OJSPlus