Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science
  • New Submission
  • ثبت‌نام
  • ورود
  • فارسی
    • English

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery

  • Home
  • اطلاعیه‌ها
  • درباره
    • درباره‌ی مجله
    • Editorial Board
    • Author Guideline
    • بیانه حریم خصوصی
    • اطلاعات تماس
  • Issues
    • بایگانی‌ها
    • شماره جاری
    • Accepted Manuscript
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Publication Ethics and Research Misconduct
    • Ethical Considerations for Human Subjects
  • Declaration of AI Use
  • New Submission
جستجوی پیشرفته
  1. صفحه اصلی
  2. بایگانی‌ها
  3. دوره 30 شماره 3 (2021): Advances in Nursing & Midwifery
  4. Research Article

دوره 30 شماره 3 (2021)

تیر 2021

Predicting Marital Conflicts in Couples Based on A Systemic Approach Mediated by Personality Traits

  • Fatemeh Dousti
  • Hassan Mirzahosseini
  • Majid Zargham Hajebi

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, دوره 30 شماره 3 (2021), 15 تیر 2021 , صفحه 28-34
https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v30i3.35637 چاپ شده: 2021-07-15

  • مقاله
  • دانلود
  • ارجاع
  • مراجع
  • آمار
  • اشتراک

چکیده

Abstract
Introduction: Marital conflicts are among the main factors that threaten marital relations and contribute to conflicts and divorces in Iranian society. The present study has been carried out in order to predict marital conflicts in couples based on a systemic approach mediated by personality traits in the cities of Tehran and Qom.
Methods: The research method was descriptive-correlational. The statistical population consisted of troubled/struggling couples in Tehran and Qom. The sample consisted of 540 men and women with marital conflict selected by convenience sampling. The research instruments included Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness, (NEO) Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), Marital Conflict Questionnaire (MCQ), and the Family Assessment Device (FAD). Data were analyzed by Pearson correlation method and structural equation modeling using SPSS version 22.0 and LISREL version 8.0 software.
Results: Results revealed that the hypothetical model fit the measurement model (CFI = 0.97; IFI = 0.96; RMSEA = 0.088). In addition, the systemic approach components mediated by personality traits were able to explain marital conflicts (P = 0.001). These components indirectly influenced marital conflicts through personality traits (β = -0.38, P = 0.005).
Conclusions: Overall, the findings verified the marital conflict model based on a systemic approach mediated by the personality traits.

کلمات کلیدی:
  • Marital conflicts
  • Personality
  • Systemic approach
  • Couples
  • PDF (English)

ارجاع به مقاله

Dousti, F. ., Mirzahosseini , H. ., & Zargham Hajebi, M. . (2021). Predicting Marital Conflicts in Couples Based on A Systemic Approach Mediated by Personality Traits. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, 30(3), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v30i3.35637
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acm-sig-proceedings##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acs-nano##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.apa##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.associacao-brasileira-de-normas-tecnicas##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.chicago-author-date##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.harvard-cite-them-right##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.ieee##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.modern-language-association##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.turabian-fullnote-bibliography##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.vancouver##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.ris##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.bibtex##

مراجع

REFERENCES

Karney BR. Socioeconomic Status and Intimate Relationships. Annu Rev Psychol. 2021;72:391-414. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-051920-013658 pmid: 32886585

Nakhaee N, Eslami M, Yazdanpanah M, Andalib P, Rahimi A, Safizadeh M, et al. Reasons for seeking a divorce in Iran. J Soc Person Relation. 2020;37(10-11):2863-70. doi: 10.1177/0265407520923041

Doherty WJ, Kalantar SM, Tarsafi M. Divorce Ambivalence and Reasons for Divorce in Iran. Fam Process. 2021;60(1):159-68. doi: 10.1111/famp.12539 pmid: 32309879

Eslami M, Yazdanpanah M, Andalib P, Rahimi A, Safizadeh M, Dadvar A, et al. Marital satisfaction and emotional divorce among Iranian married individuals: A survey of hospital visitors of nine provinces. J Educ Health Promot. 2020;9:83. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_570_19 pmid: 32509891

Mohammadi F, Imanzad M, Mohammadkhani P, Dolatshahi B, Asghari M, Tavassoli E. The effectiveness of "Mindfulness based Cognitive Therapy" on psycho-social performance of chronic low back pain patients (CLBP). Advanc Nurs Midwife. 2014;23(82):46-54.

Gray TD, Hawrilenko M, Cordova JV. Randomized Controlled Trial of the Marriage Checkup: Depression Outcomes. J Marital Fam Ther. 2020;46(3):507-22. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12411 pmid: 31584721

Sbarra DA, Hasselmo K, Bourassa KJ. Divorce and Health: Beyond Individual Differences. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2015;24(2):109-13. doi: 10.1177/0963721414559125 pmid: 25892857

Fontenelle LF, Frydman I, Hoefle S, Oliveira-Souza R, Vigne P, Bortolini TS, et al. Decoding moral emotions in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;19:82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.002 pmid: 30035005

Jalili L, Najar S, Nezamivand-Chegini S, Yaralizadeh M. The Relationship Between Factors Related to Divorce Request and Mental Health Among Divorce Applicant Women Referred to Legal Medicine Organization in Ahvaz, Iran. J Famil Reprod Health. 2017;11(3):128-37.

Hopwood CJ, Back M. Interpersonal Dynamics in Personality and Personality Disorders. Europe J Person. 2018;32(5):499-524. doi: 10.1002/per.2155

Shams Z. The relationship between personality traits and situational anxiety about marriage in young people at the age of marriage. Glob J Guid Couns Sch Curr Perspect. 2018;8(2):86-91. doi: 10.18844/gjgc.v8i2.3583

Kumari K. A Descriptive Study to Assess Attachment Styles, and Emotional Stability in Relation to Marital Satisfaction among Couples Residing in Selected Residential Areas of Gurugram, Haryana. J Adv Res Psychol Psychother. 2021;3(3&4):1-7. doi: 10.24321/2581.5822.202007

Cao H, Yuan X, Fine M, Zhou N, Fang X. Neuroticism and Marital Satisfaction During the Early Years of Chinese Marriage: The Mediating Roles of Marital Attribution and Aggression. Fam Process. 2019;58(2):478-95. doi: 10.1111/famp.12356 pmid: 29603205

Rasouli A. Developing the Model of Family Functioning based on the Components of Hope, Intimacy and Marital Conflicts in Couples. Iran J Nurs Res. 2017;12(4):1-8. doi: 10.21859/ijnr-12041

Gao MM, Du H, Davies PT, Cummings EM. Marital Conflict Behaviors and Parenting: Dyadic Links Over Time. Fam Relat. 2019;68(1):135-49. doi: 10.1111/fare.12322 pmid: 30853738

Taghani R, Ashrafizaveh A, Ghanbari Soodkhori M, Azmoude E, Tatari M. Marital satisfaction and its associated factors at reproductive age women referred to health centers. J Educ Health Promot. 2019;8:133. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_172_18 pmid: 31463318

Tasew AS, Getahun KK. Marital conflict among couples: The case of Durbete town, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Cogent Psychol. 2021;8(1):1903127. doi: 10.1080/23311908.2021.1903127

Taban M, Dolatshahi B, Eftekhar M, Pourshabaz A. The relationship between marital satisfaction with demographics characteristics in the population of Tehran 2016. Advanc Nurs Midwife. 2017;26(94):37-45.

Birditt KS, Brown E, Orbuch TL, McIlvane JM. Marital Conflict Behaviors and Implications for Divorce over 16 Years. J Marriage Fam. 2010;72(5):1188-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00758.x pmid: 24058208

Bhattacharya K. Fundamentals of Qualitative Research a Practical Guid. Publisher: Routledge.2017.

Anisi J. Validity and reliability of NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) on university students. Int J Behav Sci. 2012;5(4):351-5.

Sanaei B, Allaghemand S, Fallahati SHHA. Family and marriage scales. [In Persian]2017.

Mohammadi S, Hafezi F, Ehteshamzadeh P, Eftekhar Saadi Z, Bakhtiarpour S. The Effect of Schema Therapy on Sexual Self-Esteem in the Women Involved in Marital Conflicts. Women Health Bull. 2020;7(2):49-55.

Yousefi N. An Investigation of the Psychometric Properties of the McMaster Clinical Rating Scale (MCRS). [In Persian]. Q Educ Meas. 2012;2(7):91-120.

Yöntem MK. Development of Family Functions and Relationship in Families: A Mixed-Design Study. 2019;47(5):344-59. doi: 10.1080/01926187.2019.1673259

Akister J, Stevenson-Hinde J. Identifying families at risk: exploring the potential of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. J Fam Ther. 1991;13(4):411-21. doi: 10.1046/j..1991.00437.x

Portes PR, Howell SC, Brown JH, Eichenberger S, Mas CA. Family functions and children's postdivorce adjustment. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1992;62(4):613-7. doi: 10.1037/h0079365 pmid: 1443070

Pourmovahed Z, Yassini Ardekani SM, Mazloomy Mahmoodabad SS, Zareei Mahmoodabadi H. Implementation of the McMaster Model in Family Therapy: Effects on Family Function in Married Couples. Iran J Psychiatry. 2021;16(1):60-7. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v16i1.5380 pmid: 34054984

Kossek EE, Lee KH. Work-Family Conflict and Work-Life Conflict. Oxford Res Encycl Bus Manag [Internet]. 2017. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.52

White JK, Hendrick SS, Hendrick C. Big five personality variables and relationship constructs. Pers Individ Dif. 2004;37(7):1519-30. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.019

Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Wilson SJ. Lovesick: How Couples' Relationships Influence Health. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017;13:421-43. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045111 pmid: 28301763

Watson D, Hubbard B, Wiese D. General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: evidence from self- and partner-ratings. J Pers. 2000;68(3):413-49. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00102 pmid: 10831308

Abe S, Oshio A. Does Marital Duration Moderate (Dis)Similarity Effects of Personality on Marital Satisfaction?. 2018;8(2):1-7. doi: 10.1177/2158244018784985

Weidmann R, Ledermann T, Grob A. The Interdependence of Personality and Satisfaction in Couples. Europe Psychol. 2017;1(4):284-95. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000261

Ferrer A, Pan Y. (Annie). Divorce, Remarriage and Child Cognitive Outcomes: Evidence from Canadian Longitudinal Data of Children. J Divorce Remarriage. 2020;61(8):636-62. doi: 10.1080/10502556.2020.1827345

Vial-Dumas M, Vial-Dumas M. Pagar la culpa: matrimonio, divorcio y responsabilidad en la tradición jurídica occidental. Rev Derecho Priv. 2019(37):31-55. doi: 10.18601/01234366.n37.03

Lavner JA, Weiss B, Miller JD, Karney BR. Personality change among newlyweds: Patterns, predictors, and associations with marital satisfaction over time. Dev Psychol. 2018;54(6):1172-85. doi: 10.1037/dev0000491 pmid: 29251970

Ghahramani S, Jahromi AT, Khoshsoroor D, Seifooripour R, Sepehrpoor M. The relationship between emotional intelligence and happiness in medical students. Korean J Med Educ. 2019;31(1):29-38. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2019.116 pmid: 30852859

Ford TE, Lappi SK, Holden CJ. Personality, Humor Styles and Happiness: Happy People Have Positive Humor Styles. Eur J Psychol. 2016;12(3):320-37. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i3.1160 pmid: 27547251

Rodrigue JR, Schold JD, Morrissey P, Whiting J, Vella J, Kayler LK, et al. Mood, body image, fear of kidney failure, life satisfaction, and decisional stability following living kidney donation: Findings from the KDOC study. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(6):1397-407. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14618 pmid: 29206349

  • چکیده مشاهده شده: 375 بار
  • PDF (English) دانلود شده: 555 بار

آمار دانلود

  • لینکدین
  • تویتر
  • فیسبوک
  • گوگل پلاس
  • تلگرام

اطلاعات

  • برای خوانندگان
  • برای نویسندگان
  • برای کتابداران

زبان

  • English
  • فارسی
  • صفحه اصلی
  • بایگانی
  • ارسال مقاله
  • درباره‌ی مجله
  • تیم سردبیری
  • اطلاعات تماس

Print ISSN: 2383-3750
Electronic ISSN: 2538-399X

قدرت یافته از OJSPlus